Tuesday, April 26, 2011

American Perceptions and Knowledge of South Africa

Before I started researching South Africa, I have to admit that I didn't have a great deal of knowledge about the country.  Sure, I knew the basics, including its blatantly obvious geographic location and its longstanding AIDS epidemic, but my historical and political knowledge of the country was slim.  So when I set out to interview other Americans about their perceptions and knowledge of South Africa, I was unsure of what I’d find.  Would they have the same lack of historical and political knowledge about the country?  Or would they surprise me with the amount of information that easily flowed with their answers?

In order to get a wide set of responses, I interviewed six people of varying ages and backgrounds.  They included:
  • Anne, 16, high school student
  • Kathryn, 26, college student majoring in history
  • David, 44, graphic designer
  • Kim, 53, special education teacher
  • Michael, 68, business professor
  • Bonnie, 80, retired flight attendant

I started out with the easiest question of the bunch: what continent South Africa is located on.  Thankfully, all of them answered this first question without hesitation (of course, only after shooting me a look that suggested I was doubting their intelligence).  Just two of them, however, knew the capital city of South Africa, Cape Town.  Two others believed it was Johannesburg, South Africa’s largest city, and the remaining respondents were unsure.  

Like many other countries in Africa, South Africa is known for its wildlife.
My interviewees had a wide range of answers when asked my next question: what the first thing that came to mind was when they thought of South Africa.  The two youngest respondents, Kathryn and Anne, replied that the country made them think of safaris and its sunsets.  Another individual stated that they thought of the AIDS epidemic, while the remaining said that apartheid stood out to them when considering the country.    

“The fact that such a small portion of the population had power and control over the entire country simply because they were white is baffling,” Michael said. 

Mandela spent 27 years of his life in prison.
When I asked my interviewees more specifically about political or historical events that had occurred there over the past century, five of the respondents mentioned Nelson Mandela’s release from prison.  I was further surprised to learn that two knew the exact amount of time that Mandela had been in prison, as well as the specific prison he spent the majority of this time.  These individuals also pointed to the significance of Mandela’s release, accurately stating that he helped lead South Africa to a multi-racial democracy.  

When I narrowed down the question to historical events that had occurred in South Africa over the past five years, however, only two were able to answer.  Both of these respondents mentioned AIDS in their answer, with Kim stating that the AIDS epidemic had been growing and Bonnie recalling that the government had taken more proactive steps to fight the epidemic. 

My last question, which was perhaps the hardest of the bunch, was to narrow down historical events even further: only those that had happened within the past year.  Once again, only two answered and both of them accurately stated that the World Cup had occurred there last summer.  

Many of my interviewees were only able to correctly answer a few of my questions, but all of them demonstrated knowledge of at least one of the most important issues and events that surround South Africa: AIDS, apartheid and the freeing of Nelson Mandela.  Though Americans might have a long way to go to grasp a more complete understanding of the society, culture and politics of the country, my interviewees proved that they have basic foundational knowledge to get there. 

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Web site/Twitter of the Week

  • First online news publication in Africa
  • One of South Africa’s and Africa’s major major news publishers
  • Internationally recognized
  • Has received three Webby Honourable mentions
    • “The Oscars of the Internet”
  • Owned by M&G Media (privately-held)
  • Works closely with the London-based Guardian Newspapers
  • “We offer a podium to everyone willing to post his/her own stories on our website. Webloggers, writers, (citizen) journalists, photographers, filmmakers: everybody is welcome.”
  • An interactive Web site that allows people to share news, photos, weblogs, videos, mobile reports
  • Part of Africa Interactive, an online media company
  • Bios about employees
  • Focuses on business microfinance, society, culture, travel, nature, music and sport
Article: Tanzania: Rampaging elephants destroy crops

Friday, April 15, 2011

South Africa: Family and Politics

The family structure in South Africa has been affected by a number of factors, including its history of apartheid, poverty and the HIV/AIDS pandemic.  Up until 1993, the National Party government enforced the segregation of races, providing black citizens with medical care, education and other public services that were inferior to those offered to the white minority.  Black citizens were treated like second-class citizens, and as a result, they did not have the economic opportunities afforded to white individuals to provide for a stable family life.  The election of the African National Congress’s Nelson Mandela brought about a non-racial democracy in April 1994, but the history of apartheid has ongoing reverberations in the South African family, as well as the greater society.

Two-thirds of children in South Africa live in poverty, according to UNICEF.
Although apartheid ended over 15 years ago, poverty continues to be an ever-present problem in the nation.  South Africa has a shocking unemployment rate of 25 percent, according to BBC News--a statistic that continues to increase as a result of globalization.  More and more jobs are being lost in sectors that cannot compete in the growing global market, which has left a growing number of parents unable to provide adequate resources for their children to stay healthy and prosper in life. 

It is important to note, however, that the government has responded with policies to combat the effects of poverty on families.  Its substantial social grants system calls for free primary health care for pregnant women and children under the age of six, as well as exempted school fees for those who cannot afford them.  Still, many argue that the social security system is inefficient and inadequate, pointing out that the rates of inflation have led the cost of supporting a family to skyrocket.

The family structure in South Africa has perhaps most significantly been affected by the HIV/AIDS pandemic.  The country has a higher number of HIV-positive individuals than any other nation in the world, which has led to an increasing number of orphan children and child-headed households.  In fact, 23 percent of South African children were living with neither of their biological parents in 2008, according to the University of Capetown.  

The HIV/AIDS epidemic is now garnering more attention from the government.





The HIV/AIDS crisis received a criticized lack of attention by former President Thabo Mbeki, who suggested that antiretroviral drugs were potentially harmful and even went as far as to question whether HIV causes AIDS.  However, current President Jacob Zuma has stated that actions will be taken to ensure that HIV-positive individuals are treated earlier, and that drug therapy would be expanded for HIV-positive pregnant women and babies.  

The family structure in South Africa has historically been plagued with a number of political, economic and social problems.  Though the current government is taking steps to help combat the plight of its citizens, it is clear that there is still a great deal left to be done in the realm of politics to bring about a stable family unit in South Africa.